Court Opinion: Presiding Disciplinary Judge Opinion for March 15

Editor’s Note: Law Week Colorado edits court opinion summaries for style and, when necessary, length.

People v. Matthew Alexander Kilby


In one matter, a client retained Matthew Kilby in a dissolution of marriage action for a $2,500 flat fee, which the client paid in advance. In error, Kilby then treated the matter as an hourly fee case, withdrawing funds as if he earned them on an hourly fee basis, according to a disciplinary opinion. Kilby failed to timely file proof of mediation in the case. As a result, the presiding judge vacated the hearing, warning that the case would be dismissed if the parties failed to timely file a joint management certificate. The judge later dismissed the case for failure to comply. 

Over the next two months, the client emailed Kilby several times requesting an update, but Kilby never provided one. The client later contacted court personnel and learned her case had been dismissed. She then asked Kilby to withdraw and requested a refund. Kilby didn’t respond. Instead, about a month later, Kilby provided the client a notice of firm closure in which he explained he was experiencing health and personal issues that significantly affected his ability to represent clients. During the representation, Kilby had withdrawn from his trust account all the client’s funds believing he earned them on an hourly basis. He later refunded the client’s full retainer.

In a second matter, a client hired Kilby in a child custody matter. Kilby petitioned for allocation of parental responsibilities, and the parties mediated. About six weeks later, opposing counsel moved to compel and for sanctions, alleging that Kilby’s client had failed to file financial disclosures despite several requests for compliance. The court granted the motion to compel in part, directing the parties to provide a status update at the pretrial conference. But Kilby and his client, who was not apprised of the conference, failed to appear. 

The court ordered them to appear and show cause why it shouldn’t impose sanctions. At the show cause hearing, Kilby and his client again failed to appear; neither was aware of the court’s order because Kilby hadn’t checked his e-filing notices. Just three days before the contested custody hearing, Kilby moved to withdraw as the client’s counsel due to personal reasons. 

At the custody hearing, the client appeared, but Kilby didn’t. The court determined that Kilby engaged in improper conduct by, among other things, failing to make financial disclosures, attend the pretrial conference and respond to the show cause motion and sanctions motion, according to the opinion. The court ordered Kilby to pay opposing counsel’s fees, which Kilby eventually paid. The client received Kilby’s notice of firm closure but was unable to hire another lawyer due to lack of funds.

The Presiding Disciplinary Judge approved Kilby’s stipulation to discipline and suspended Kilby for one year and one day, all to be stayed pending Kilby’s successful completion of a three-year conditional probation, effective March 15. The stipulation takes into account significant mitigating factors, according to the opinion.

Previous articleColorado Supreme Court Holds Alleged Violations of Colorado Fair Housing Act May be Asserted as Affirmative Defense in Residential Evictions
Next articleProject Ganesha Aims to Help Women, Diverse Associates Thrive in Private Practice

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here